I may or may not believe tattooing is always dangerous.
But if it is, how is it any different from smoking?
Smokers are also harming their bodies, therefore being reckless about their health, and THEY can get hired.
Yet if you have a visible tattoo or even in some cases having one at all (whether visible or hidden), you can't get hired.
Why is this?
You can choose to smoke or not.
You can be addicted to something but realize it's bad and choose whether to quit or continue.
Tattoos aren't addictive for everyone, but they sure are for some people.
Are you naive?
Since when did you have no choice but to smoke?