Let's say we can finally create a wormhole, is it possible to create a wormhole inside a black hole? Will the small segment of the black hole exibit a gravitational pull strong enough for a gravity assist or even have enough hawkins energy to keep the wormhole open? Can such an engine in theory be a self sustained engine?
Responses (1)
Black holes exist only in somebody's imagination. The basis of the theory is an assumption that a body can collapse under its own gravitation. One exercise in PHYSICS 101 is to integrate the gravitation inside a sphere. If it is hollow there is no net gravitation anywhere inside. If it is solid then gravitation gets lower as you approach the center, and at the center it is zero. Isaac Newton was the first to point out these things. In real life gravitation depends a lot on the density of rocks and materials nearby, and also on centrifugal force as the body rotates. So the foundational assumption of the black hole is nonsense.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_theorem
In Einstein's theory the gravitational field, manifest in the curvature of spacetime, is coupled to its sources by the field equations, the sources being described by an appropriate energy-momentum tensor, and so the Principle of Superposition does not apply. This means that one cannot simply pile up masses in any given spacetime because the field equations must be solved for each and every configuration of matter proposed.
(This paragraph was taken from news.yahoo.com/black-holes-may-supermassive-eating-stars-134604121.html but they deleted it from the article. Apparently somebody couldn't stand the implication of what it said.)
Second source: www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2012/08/16/a-blind-man-in-a-dark-room-looking-for-a-black-hole-that-isnt-there-2/
For the final nail in the theory, it depends heavily on the gravitational constant being constant, which it is not. It varies in the third decimal.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitation_constant
If you want free energy, it's here: www.cheniere.org/ It works, but not well enough for a commercial model.
The point is you should not assume something is true just because you keep hearing it. All science is based on observations. Nobody has observed a black hole without first assuming that a black hole was what they were looking at. No observation - no science.
Hi,
1. black hole SDSS J010013.02+280225.8 is the largest and brightest ever found. If black holes were an imagination an occurrence would not have been found. Black hole is more of a general name for a lot of unexplained objects and phenomenons in the universe. We know there is something or somethings but we don't know what is it exactly.
2. Shell theory is correct. But there are infinite number of consecutive shells which in turn form earth. Each shell will exert it's own gravity on a given point in space.
3. It would be incorrect to say there is no gravity at the centre of the earth. The gravity does become zero for an observer as the observer decends but that is because there is no mass from the earth on top of the observer. At the centre of the earth the gravity gets cancelled out because of the pull at the centre from all directions. The centre however still exerts a gravitational pull at the surrounding particles (how ever negligible it might be), for a contradiction to occur the centre must be composed entirely of 'nothing'.
4. Yes it is true that Infinite densities do not exist in special relativity. But then again there are a lot of things Special Relativity does not explain for that we have Quantum Mechanics, M-theory, String theory, etc. But I am not versed in anyone them, so I am not sure. But I'll read up on them later and see how they explain infinite density.
5. Yes gravitational contant is not contant. It does not mean there is a problem with it. It just means we are about to find out something new.
Thank you for the answer. It was very informative.