Many of my colleagues have asked the same question, and it seems to elude most individuals, and anger many people biased on the subject. But regardless of the reaction they have, they still provide no answer, they just give an opinion. Well, my peers and I have decided it is finally time to ask the most unanswered question of all time. When I was first introduced to pumpers, I was fascinated and intrigued, as well was the scientific community as a whole. Then came the tumblers, who were also marvelled by intellectuals around the world. Both parties seemed valid and legitimate, but then, after the tumbler creation, the age old debate came about and reared its ugly head. I'm of course talking about the debate of who was better: the pumpers, or the tumblers. When it came down to actually explaining why the one group was better, the person explaining their reasons only exhibited favoritism of the preferred group. But now it's time to but put biases and opinions aside and get to the knitty gritty, the hard but actual truth. Who is better? Pumpers? Or Tumblers?
Responses (1)
Well Steve, the question you have posed is as timeless and as mysterious as the origin of life itself. Scientifically speaking, your question compares to scientific mysteries such as: what is the origin of phospholipid bilayer in Eukaryotic cells? Which genetic mutation cause Archaea to produce O2 in the Earth's atmosphere?. Of course there is no concrete answer to questions like these, only scattered evidence and opinionated theories. What I can do to answer your question is to gather the only known facts on Pumpers and Tumblers. What is concrete: Pumpers like to pump, Pumpers need to pump. Thus one can infer than without pumping, there would be no pumpers. Now lets look at Tumblers. What is concrete: Tumblers better than pumpers. I see tumblers. What is inconcrete: Ain't those tumblers cool? Also, we have visual evidence: Again, tumblers better than pumpers, but also, pumpers=LAME. Now if we gather all this data, based solely on semantics, I can safely say that tumblers ARE better than pumpers. However, sometimes semantics aren't enough, scientifically speaking. Until we design an experiment to confirm these semantics, I will say that there is no definitive answer. So I will answer your question by saying that at this time, it is undetermined which group is better. Perhaps we can ask Dr. Jimes Trooper and his respected colleague, Dr. H. Donna Gust to assist us with designing an experiment. Also this is off topic, but I am hosting a party for some of my adult friends, and I will be needing your assisting in booking some child clowns. I look forward to doing business with you.